Experience Matters: 30,000+ Products Stacked per Hour by Granta Palletiser Systems

When you invest in automation, you’re not buying theory—you’re buying results.

Every day, our palletising systems stack more than 30,000 products per hour in live production environments across customer sites. These aren’t test cells or demo lines. They’re real factories, real products, real pressures—and our palletisers deliver, shift after shift.

That’s what we mean when we say: experience matters.

Proven Performance, Where It Counts

We design and supply palletisers built to perform on real production lines. From FMCG and food to chemical and packaging applications, our systems are trusted to run at high throughput, often around the clock.

Because our palletisers are stacking thousands of pallets every week across multiple sites, we gain invaluable real‑world insight into:

  • Long-term reliability
  • Product and packaging variation
  • Line speed changes and production peaks
  • Operator interaction and maintenance needs

This continuous feedback loop directly shapes every system we build.

Engineered for Real Production Demands

Our palletisers are designed to integrate seamlessly into your operation—not the other way around.

We build our systems with:

  • Robust mechanical design for continuous, high‑cycle operation
  • Flexible pallet patterns for boxes, shelf ready cartons, trays, bags, etc.
  • Intelligent controls that coordinate smoothly with upstream and downstream equipment
  • Operator‑friendly interfaces on our easy-to-use programming software that simplify day‑to‑day use

The result is automation that performs reliably in the hands of your production team.

Our Palletisers in Action

Seeing automation perform in a real production environment says more than any specification sheet. Below are examples of our palletising systems operating, stacking pallets at full production speed.

Cobot Palletiser

This video demonstrates our collaborative robot (cobot) palletising system operating safely alongside production staff. The cobot handles products with precision while maintaining a compact footprint, making it ideal for sites where space is limited or where operators and automation need to work closely together. It’s a clear example of how cobot palletising can increase throughput, reduce manual handling, and integrate smoothly into existing workflows.

Box Palletising

This video showcases one of our box palletising systems operating in a live production environment. You’ll see how the system handles consistent carton placement, smooth layer formation, and stable pallet builds. It’s a clear demonstration of how our palletisers maintain accuracy and reliability.

Container Unloading and Palletising

In this clip, you’ll see our container unloading and palletising system creating a seamless, continuous flow of palletised product. The system can be quickly reprogrammed by production staff to handle different product types, allowing multiple‑SKU containers to be unloaded quickly and efficiently. Throughout the process, it maintains stable, repeatable pallet patterns whilst reducing manual handling and increase overall efficiency.

Modular Palletising Cell

This video demonstrates some of our modular robotic palletising systems in action, showing how they automatically create stable pallet stacks with speed and precision. The system handles a wide range of product types, generates pallet patterns automatically, and can be quickly reconfigured as production needs change. It’s a clear example of how robotic palletising increases throughput, reduces manual handling, and delivers a flexible, future‑proof solution for end‑of‑line automation.

Experience You Can Rely On

When your palletiser is stacking hundreds of pallets per shift, small details matter. Over years of supplying palletising systems, we’ve helped customers overcome challenges such as:

  • Variable pack quality
  • Limited floor space
  • Short changeover windows
  • High throughput with minimal downtime

This accumulated experience allows us to anticipate issues early and design systems that work reliably in your environment from day one.

Why Experience Matters

Stacking 30,000+ products per hour onto pallets across customer sites isn’t just a statistic—it’s proof that our palletisers perform where it matters most.

When you choose Granta Automation, you’re choosing a palletising partner with systems already delivering results in demanding production environments.

Because proven experience on the factory floor makes all the difference.

If you’re considering palletising automation, talk to us about our systems, designed from real‑world experience- 01223 499488 or helpline@granta-automation.co.uk.

Bag PalletiserBag Palletiser
Barrel PalletiserBarrel Palletiser
Box PalletiserBox Palletiser
Crate PalletiserCrate Palletiser
Tray PalletiserTray Palletiser

Posted in Auto Palletiser, Automated Container Unloading, Automated Palletising, Bag Palletiser, Box Palletiser, Cobot Palletiser, Compact Palletiser, Company news, Container Destuffing, Container Destuffing Palletising, Container Unloading Palletising, Depalletising, Granta Updates, Modular Palletiser, Palletiser, Palletiser - Granta Palletiser System, Palletising, Robotic Palletiser, Robotic Palletising, Small Palletiser | Tagged , | Comments Off on Experience Matters: 30,000+ Products Stacked per Hour by Granta Palletiser Systems

Rental vs Capex vs Leasing: Choosing the Right Automation Financing

Picture your production line as a new palletiser comes online. Operations are excited about the efficiency gains, while finance is weighing the impact on budgets and long‑term planning. Should the equipment be purchased outright, rented, or leased?

For many UK manufacturers, this decision shapes cash flow, strategic flexibility, and how quickly automation can be deployed. At Granta Automation, we help businesses navigate these options to find the solution that best fits their needs.

Understanding Your Financing Options

1. Rental / Operating Lease

A rental or operating lease gives you access to automation equipment without the need for upfront capital. Payments are typically monthly or quarterly, turning a capital purchase into an operating expense.

Why rental works well:

  • Protects cash flow
  • Easy to upgrade or change equipment
  • Predictable budgeting

Points to consider:

  • Higher cumulative cost over long periods
  • No ownership
  • Contract limitations for early changes

2. Capex / Purchase

Purchasing automation equipment outright adds it to your balance sheet as a fixed asset. This is often preferred by manufacturers with stable production volumes and long‑term investment plans.

Key advantages:

  • Full ownership
  • Capital allowances and depreciation
  • Lowest lifetime cost for long‑life equipment

Points to consider:

  • High upfront investment
  • Obsolescence risk
  • Maintenance responsibility

3. Leasing (Finance Lease)

Leasing is one of the most popular routes for Granta customers, offering a balance between affordability and long‑term ownership. Unlike rental, leasing allows you to own the palletiser at the end of the term for a small nominal fee, while still benefiting from low monthly payments.

Why leasing is so effective:

  • Immediate access to automation
  • Fast return on investment
  • Predictable monthly payments
  • Preserves cash flow
  • Quick finance decisions
  • Simple agreements

At the end of the lease, the palletiser can be purchased for a small nominal fee, allowing you to continue benefiting from the equipment for many years.

Financing Options Comparison Table

Rental / Operating LeaseLeasing (Finance Lease)Capex / Purchase
Upfront CostLowLowHigh
OwnershipNoYes (end of term)Yes
Balance Sheet ImpactOperating expenseFinance agreementAsset added
Cash Flow ImpactMinimalMinimalSignificant initial impact
Long‑Term CostHighestMediumLowest
Maintenance ResponsibilityOften includedTypically customerCustomer
Ideal ForRapid scaling, short‑term needsCash‑flow‑sensitive long‑term usersStable long‑term operations

Which Approach Fits Your Business?

The right choice depends on your growth plans, cash position, and how quickly your production environment evolves.  The scenarios below give you some example cases and the best fit solution.

Scenario A – Fast‑Growing Start‑Up

A new food packaging company needs automation immediately to keep up with demand. Leasing allows them to install a palletiser now, maintain cash flow, and benefit from predictable monthly payments while they scale.

Scenario B – Established Manufacturer

A multi‑site beverage producer wants consistent processes across all plants. Purchasing core automation equipment provides long‑term cost stability and asset value, while leasing additional equipment helps them expand capacity without large upfront spend.

Many manufacturers often use a hybrid strategy:

  • Lease equipment that delivers long‑term value but needs to be cash‑flow friendly
  • Rent equipment that may need regular upgrading
  • Purchase core assets with long service life

To support your decision, these tools can be used to estimate the potential savings from a palletiser system and its likely payback period.

Automation isn’t just a technical upgrade — it’s a strategic investment. In many cases, leasing the system results in a monthly cost that’s significantly lower than the savings it generates, meaning you start saving money from day one. Choosing the right financing route ensures your business can scale efficiently, manage costs, and stay competitive, and we’re here to support you through every step of that decision process.

If you’d to discuss you requirements for palletising solutions, feel free to contact us on 01223 499488 or helpline@granta-automation.co.uk and we will be happy to help.

Bag PalletiserBag Palletiser
Barrel PalletiserBarrel Palletiser
Box PalletiserBox Palletiser
Crate PalletiserCrate Palletiser
Tray PalletiserTray Palletiser

Posted in AGVs, AMRs, Auto Palletiser, Automated Container Unloading, Automated Palletising, Bag Palletiser, Box Palletiser, Cobot Palletiser, Compact Palletiser, Company news, Container Destuffing, Container Destuffing Palletising, Container Unloading Palletising, Depalletising, Granta Updates, Modular Palletiser, Palletiser, Palletiser - Granta Palletiser System, Palletising, Robotic Palletiser, Robotic Palletising, Small Palletiser | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Rental vs Capex vs Leasing: Choosing the Right Automation Financing

How to Integrate a Palletiser into an Existing Production Line

Integrating a palletiser into an existing production line is far more than a simple equipment installation. When done well, it becomes a strategic upgrade that increases throughput, reduces manual handling, and delivers consistent, reliable performance. Achieving these outcomes requires a structured approach that aligns the palletiser’s capabilities with the specific demands of your production environment.

1. Conduct a Comprehensive Production Audit

A successful integration begins with a detailed audit of your current production line. Understanding how your operation runs day‑to‑day ensures the palletiser you choose will complement—not constrain—your workflow.

Key areas to assess include:

  • Throughput and Performance Metrics: Identify peak and average line speeds. If the palletiser cannot keep pace, it will create bottlenecks rather than efficiencies.
  • Product Profile and Packaging Variability: Review product dimensions, weights, fragility, and packaging formats. These factors determine the required gripping tools, stacking patterns, and palletiser configuration.
  • Spatial Constraints and Facility Layout: Measure available floor space, ceiling height, and access routes. Consider not only the footprint of the palletiser but also safe operator access, maintenance clearance, and potential future expansion.
  • Existing Material Flow and Conveyance Systems: Map upstream and downstream product movement to identify the most efficient integration points.

A thorough audit at this stage prevents costly misalignment and ensures the palletiser enhances productivity from day one.

2. Select the Appropriate Palletiser Type

Palletisers are not one-size-fits-all solutions. The right choice depends on your product mix, throughput requirements, available space, and long-term automation strategy.

Common options include:

  • Cobot Palletisers: Designed for flexibility, ease of use, and collaborative operation. Cobot palletisers are ideal for low-to-medium production volumes, frequent changeovers, and operations handling multiple SKUs. Their intuitive programming allows quick adjustment for different case sizes, weights, and pallet patterns with minimal downtime.
  • Industrial Robot Palletisers: Built for high throughput, continuous operation, and heavier payloads. These systems excel in demanding environments and are well suited to facilities managing multiple SKUs at scale, offering fast changeovers, precise placement, and the ability to adapt to varying packaging formats.

Working with a supplier who can tailor the system to your exact requirements ensures optimal performance and future scalability.

3. Plan the Integration Carefully

Integration involves more than positioning a palletiser on the factory floor. It must be fully synchronised with your existing automation, control systems, and safety infrastructure.

Key considerations include:

  • Conveyors and Product Feeding: Upstream conveyors must deliver products consistently, with correct orientation and spacing. Poor presentation can compromise even the most advanced palletiser.
  • Automation and Control Integration: The palletiser should communicate seamlessly with your PLC or MES, enabling coordinated product flow, error detection, and real‑time data visibility.
  • Safety Protocols and Accessibility: Install guards, interlocks, and emergency stops in line with safety standards, while maintaining easy access for maintenance and cleaning.
  • Utility Requirements: Confirm that power supply, compressed air, and network connectivity meet the palletiser’s operational needs.

Early collaboration between engineering, production, and automation teams ensures a smooth integration and avoids delays during commissioning.

4. Commissioning and Validation

Commissioning is where the system proves itself in real‑world conditions. A structured commissioning process ensures reliability, efficiency, and long‑term performance.

Key steps include:

  • Initial Trials: Test the palletiser with actual production materials to validate speed, accuracy, and pallet stability.
  • Fine‑Tuning: Adjust gripping tools, stacking patterns, and cycle timings to minimise product damage and maximise efficiency.
  • Operator Training: Provide comprehensive training on operation, troubleshooting, and routine maintenance to ensure confident day‑to‑day use.
  • Data Synchronisation: Verify that performance data integrates correctly with your monitoring systems to support ongoing optimisation and predictive maintenance.

A well‑executed commissioning phase reduces downtime and establishes a strong foundation for long‑term reliability.

5. Optimise for Long‑Term Performance

Integration is not a one‑time event. Continuous optimisation ensures the palletiser remains efficient and adaptable as production demands evolve.

Focus on:

  • Preventive Maintenance: Regular servicing reduces unexpected stoppages and extends equipment lifespan.
  • Performance Monitoring: Track throughput, downtime, and error trends to identify opportunities for improvement.
  • Scalability and Flexibility: Choose modular systems or upgrade paths that allow you to introduce new products, increase volumes, or expand production lines in the future.

With ongoing optimisation, the palletiser becomes a key component of a resilient, future‑ready automation strategy.

Integrating a palletiser into an existing production line is a strategic investment that strengthens efficiency, safety, and long‑term scalability. By carrying out a detailed production audit, selecting the right palletising technology, planning the integration carefully, and committing to thorough commissioning and ongoing optimisation, operational performance can be significantly enhanced.

At Granta Automation we guide all our customers through every stage of this process—from initial assessment to long‑term optimisation—ensuring the system is tailored to your exact requirements and fully aligned with your production goals. With the right partner, palletiser integration becomes more than a technical upgrade; it becomes a catalyst for measurable, lasting business improvement.

If you’d to discuss you requirements for palletising solutions, feel free to contact us on 01223 499488 or helpline@granta-automation.co.uk and we will be happy to help.

Bag PalletiserBag Palletiser
Barrel PalletiserBarrel Palletiser
Box PalletiserBox Palletiser
Crate PalletiserCrate Palletiser
Tray PalletiserTray Palletiser

Posted in Auto Palletiser, Automated Container Unloading, Automated Palletising, Bag Palletiser, Box Palletiser, Cobot Palletiser, Compact Palletiser, Company news, Container Destuffing, Container Destuffing Palletising, Container Unloading Palletising, Depalletising, Granta Updates, Modular Palletiser, Palletiser, Palletiser - Granta Palletiser System, Palletising, Robotic Palletiser, Robotic Palletising | Tagged , | Comments Off on How to Integrate a Palletiser into an Existing Production Line

In‑House Integration vs. Hiring an Expert Integrator: Understanding the True Cost

As modern automation systems become more interconnected, data‑driven, and business‑critical, integration decisions have shifted from being purely technical to deeply strategic. Yet many organisations still evaluate the choice between in‑house integration and hiring an expert integrator through a narrow financial lens.

Hourly rates versus salaries. External fees versus internal headcount.

This comparison feels intuitive—but it is incomplete. In many cases, it is misleading.

The true cost of integration is not defined by what you pay to build a system. It is defined by what you pay to own, operate, adapt, and recover from that system over its entire lifecycle.

When viewed through that broader lens, the economics of integration look very different.

Why In‑House Integration Appears Cheaper—Initially

There are valid reasons organisations gravitate toward internal integration:

  • Existing engineers already understand the process
  • Internal resources feel “paid for”
  • Teams retain direct control over priorities
  • Knowledge stays inside the business

For small, incremental changes, this approach can be efficient. Internal teams can respond quickly, avoid procurement cycles, and make adjustments without external coordination.

But as project complexity grows, the apparent cost advantage of in‑house integration erodes rapidly.

The Hidden Costs Most Teams Never Model

The largest cost drivers of in‑house integration rarely appear in budgets, proposals, or project justifications. They emerge later—quietly, consistently, and expensively.

1. Opportunity Cost: The Silent Multiplier

Controls and automation engineers are rarely sitting idle. They are responsible for:

  • Supporting daily production
  • Maintaining legacy systems
  • Improving throughput and quality
  • Responding to downtime events

When these same engineers are pulled into a major integration project, something else must give. Maintenance gets deferred. Improvement projects stall. Downtime response becomes reactive.

The business pays for this indirectly through:

  • Reduced efficiency
  • Increased downtime risk
  • Slower continuous improvement
  • Higher operational variability

Opportunity cost is rarely budgeted—but it is always paid.

2. Integration Is a Specialised Engineering Discipline

Integration is not simply writing PLC code or connecting devices. It is systems engineering.

It requires deep experience in:

  • Multi‑vendor hardware coordination
  • Network architecture and segmentation
  • Functional safety and compliance
  • OT–IT data flow and cybersecurity
  • Failure modes, edge cases, and recovery strategies

Most internal teams excel in some of these areas—but very few excel in all. The gaps are filled through trial‑and‑error on live systems, where mistakes have real operational consequences.

Learning curves are expensive when the classroom is a running production line.

3. Debugging Time Scales Nonlinearly

Integration issues compound. A small architectural decision made early can surface weeks later during commissioning, often in ways that are difficult to trace.

Without extensive prior experience:

  • Root cause analysis takes longer
  • Fixes introduce new issues
  • Commissioning timelines stretch unpredictably

What begins as “a few extra days” can easily become:

  • Weeks of delay
  • Extended downtime
  • Rushed compromises that remain in the system for years

This is where the cost of in‑house integration becomes most visible—and most painful.

The Financial Impact of Project Risk

Risk is often treated as an abstract concept, but its consequences are concrete and measurable:

  • Missed production targets
  • Delayed product launches
  • Extended shutdowns
  • Emergency contractor support
  • Post‑launch rework

When integration is done internally, the organisation carries 100% of that risk. There is no contractual buffer, no external accountability, and no escalation path if the project veers off course.

That exposure has real financial value—even if it never appears on a spreadsheet.

What Expert Integrators Actually Deliver

Hiring an expert integrator is not simply outsourcing labour. It is acquiring experience density—the accumulated knowledge of dozens or hundreds of similar projects.

Beyond project execution, expert integrators also bring the benefit of extensive R&D that has already been completed long before your project begins. Instead of developing tools, standards, and solutions from scratch, you gain access to proven software frameworks, easy‑to‑use programming software, diagnostic tools that automatically track issues, and design refinements shaped by hundreds of previous deployments. These small but critical details—error‑proofing features, intuitive interfaces, optimised logic structures, pre‑validated safety functions, and CE‑compliant design practices—compound into systems that run faster, start-up cleaner, and deliver more reliable production day after day. The quality that comes from mass‑produced engineering, rather than one‑off development, reduces long‑term maintenance effort and ensures the system performs consistently under real‑world conditions. In effect, you are not just buying integration services—you are inheriting years of accumulated engineering investment that would be impractical and costly to replicate internally.

1. Decisions Made Once—Correctly

Experienced integrators have already encountered the failure modes most internal teams have never seen. That experience manifests in:

  • Cleaner, more scalable architectures
  • Clearer interface definitions
  • Maintainable, standards‑driven code
  • Robust documentation

These decisions reduce long‑term support costs and make future modifications faster, safer, and cheaper.

2. Predictability and Structure

A strong integrator brings discipline to the project:

  • Defined scope and assumptions
  • Formal testing and validation
  • Controlled change management
  • Documented acceptance criteria

Predictability has economic value. Projects that finish on time and perform as specified avoid the cascading costs of uncertainty.

3. Faster Commissioning, Lower Downtime

Because expert integrators have done it before—many times—they commission systems faster and more methodically. This typically results in:

  • Shorter shutdown windows
  • Fewer startup surprises
  • Faster stabilisation after go‑live

For many facilities, avoiding even a few days of lost production can justify the entire integration fee.

Long‑Term Ownership Costs Matter More Than Build Costs

The most overlooked part of the integration decision is what happens after the project is delivered.

Systems built without a cohesive integration strategy often suffer from:

  • Inconsistent standards
  • Poor or missing documentation
  • Fragile logic understood by only one person
  • Patchwork architectures that resist modification

These issues quietly inflate the cost of:

  • Troubleshooting
  • Training new staff
  • Adding new equipment
  • Scaling production
  • Maintaining uptime

Expert integrators design systems intended to be owned—not just installed.

The Hybrid Model: The Most Resilient Approach

The most successful organisations rarely choose between internal and external integration. Instead, they combine the strengths of both.

They:

  • Use expert integrators for architecture, complex systems, and high‑risk integration
  • Leverage internal teams for day‑to‑day support and incremental improvements
  • Require documentation, standards, and knowledge transfer as part of every project

This approach builds internal capability without forcing internal teams to absorb disproportionate risk.

Reframing the Real Question

The question is not:

“Is it cheaper to do this ourselves?”

The real question is:

“What does failure, delay, or rigidity cost us—and how likely is it?”

When integration decisions are evaluated through that lens, the economics shift dramatically.

Final Thought

Automation integration sits at the intersection of engineering, operations, and business performance. Decisions made at this stage echo for years—sometimes decades.

The true cost of integration is not determined by who writes the code, but by how well the system performs, adapts, and supports the business over time.

In that context, the choice between in‑house integration and an expert integrator is not about saving money—it is about protecting value.

If you’d to discuss you requirements for palletising solutions, feel free to contact us on 01223 499488 or helpline@granta-automation.co.uk and we will be happy to help.

Bag PalletiserBag Palletiser
Barrel PalletiserBarrel Palletiser
Box PalletiserBox Palletiser
Crate PalletiserCrate Palletiser
Tray PalletiserTray Palletiser

Posted in AGVs, AMRs, Auto Palletiser, Automated Container Unloading, Automated Palletising, Bag Palletiser, Box Palletiser, Cobot Palletiser, Compact Palletiser, Company news, Container Destuffing, Container Destuffing Palletising, Container Unloading Palletising, Depalletising, Granta Updates, Modular Palletiser, Palletiser, Palletiser - Granta Palletiser System, Palletising, Robotic Palletiser, Robotic Palletising, Small Palletiser, Uncategorized | Tagged , | Comments Off on In‑House Integration vs. Hiring an Expert Integrator: Understanding the True Cost

How to Choose Between a Cobot and an Industrial Robot for Palletising

Palletising automation is a strategic priority for manufacturers and logistics operators looking to reduce labour costs, improve workplace safety, and increase output at the end of their production lines. As businesses continue to streamline their operations, the choice between collaborative robots (cobots) and traditional industrial robots has become a key decision point. Each technology offers distinct advantages, and understanding these differences is essential for selecting the most effective solution.

At Granta Automation, we specialise in designing palletising systems that align with each customer’s operational goals. By evaluating factors such as throughput, payload, safety, flexibility, and available floor space, we help businesses identify the palletising approach that delivers the greatest long‑term value. This article explores how cobots and industrial robots compare and provides guidance on choosing the right system for your production environment.

Cobots vs Industrial Robots: Understanding the Core Difference

Cobots are engineered to work safely alongside human operators. Their integrated force‑sensing technology allows them to detect unexpected contact and stop immediately, enabling safe operation without the need for fixed guarding in collaborative mode. This makes cobots particularly well‑suited to environments where people and automation must work in close proximity.

Industrial robots, by contrast, operate within fully safeguarded cells. This controlled environment allows them to run at significantly higher speeds and handle heavier payloads, making them ideal for high‑volume, high‑duty palletising applications where maximum throughput is essential.

When to Choose a Cobot Palletiser

Cobots offer a compelling blend of safety, flexibility, and ease of deployment. They are especially valuable in operations where products are lightweight and human interaction is frequent or product lines change regularly.

  • Built‑In Collaborative Safety
    Cobots are designed with advanced force‑sensing capabilities that allow them to operate safely near people. In collaborative mode, they automatically slow or stop when interaction is detected, supporting safer workflows without the need for fixed guarding.
  • Dual‑Mode Operation for Enhanced Productivity
    A major advantage of Granta’s cobot palletisers is their ability to operate in both collaborative and industrial modes. When paired with additional safety systems—such as guarding, light curtains, or safety scanners—cobots can run at full industrial speeds until a person enters the safety zone. They then automatically switch to collaborative mode, maintaining safety without compromising productivity.
  • Compact Footprint and Rapid Deployment
    Cobots are typically smaller and easier to integrate into existing production lines enabling fast installation, minimal disruption, and seamless integration into space‑constrained facilities.  Portable cobot palletiser systems are also available from Granta, enabling you to move the system between different production lines.
  • Intuitive Programming and Fast Changeovers
    Granta’s easy programming software enables operators to set up new products, adjust pallet patterns, and modify configurations quickly without the need for specialist programming knowledge. This makes the system fast and easy to reprogram for operations with frequent product changes or short production runs.
  • Flexible Safety Configurations
    Cobots can be deployed with a range of safety setups:
    • Collaborative‑only operation (no guarding)
    • Guarding with light curtains for full‑speed operation until the curtain is breached
    • Safety scanners for dynamic switching between industrial and collaborative speeds
  • Ideal for Agile, Mixed‑Product Environments
    Cobots excel in operations where product types, pallet patterns, or production demands change frequently. Their flexibility supports agile manufacturing strategies and rapid adaptation to new requirements.

When to Choose an Industrial Robot Palletiser

Industrial robots remain the preferred choice for high‑volume, heavy‑duty palletising applications where speed and payload capacity are critical.

  • High Speed and Heavy Payload Capability
    Industrial robots deliver the highest throughput and can handle significantly heavier loads than cobots. Granta’s industrial palletising systems are engineered for precision, consistency, and continuous duty, making them ideal for demanding, high‑output environments.
  • Robust Automation with Full Safeguarding
    Operating within a guarded cell allows industrial robots to run at maximum speed without collaborative‑mode limitations. This ensures optimal cycle times and reliable, uninterrupted operation.
  • Advanced End‑of‑Arm Tooling / Gripper Options
    Industrial robots support a wide range of grippers—including vacuum, under grip, row‑gripping, and layer‑forming tools—enabling high speed and efficient handling of complex or high‑volume palletising tasks.
  • Multi‑Line and Autonomous Operation
    Industrial systems can be configured to service multiple production lines and operate with minimal human intervention, supporting fully autonomous palletising and maximising overall equipment effectiveness. Industrial palletisers can pick multiple product types from multiple lines, allowing a single system to manage high‑volume, mixed‑product workflows with consistent speed, accuracy and fully automated pallet formation.
  • Intuitive Programming and Fast Changeovers
    Granta’s easy programming software enables operators to set up new products, adjust pallet patterns, and modify configurations quickly without the need for specialist programming knowledge. This is ideal for operations with frequent product changes or short production runs.

Key Factors to Consider When Choosing

Selecting between a cobot and an industrial robot depends on your operational priorities:

  • Production Throughput
    High‑volume operations typically benefit from industrial robots. Cobots with guarding can achieve comparable speeds while retaining collaborative flexibility.
  • Payload and Reach
    Cobots generally handle lighter payloads with the Granta cobot able to handle a payload of 30kg, while industrial robots can handle 140 kg and support row or layer picking.
  • Safety and Human Interaction
    Cobots are ideal where operators frequently work near the palletising area. Industrial robots suit isolated, high‑speed environments.
  • Flexibility and Changeovers
    With the Granta easy programming system on all our palletising systems, both systems are well suited to rapid product changeovers, enabling operators to adjust pallet patterns, introduce new SKUs, and reconfigure layouts quickly without specialist programming knowledge.
  • Total Cost of Ownership
    Cobots often provide lower initial investment and faster ROI for flexible operations, however a compact industrial robot palletiser can often be similar pricing to a cobot palletiser. Industrial robots deliver strong long‑term value in high‑output environments.  Both systems can be hired or leased, eliminating the need for large upfront capital investment.

Cobot vs Industrial Robot: At‑a‑Glance Comparison

CriteriaCobot PalletiserIndustrial Robot Palletiser
Primary StrengthFlexibility, safety, ease of integrationHigh speed, heavy payloads, maximum throughput
Typical PayloadLow–medium (30kg)Medium–very high (140Kg)
Operating SpeedReduced in collaborative mode; full speed with guarding or safetyFull industrial speeds
Safety ApproachBuilt‑in force sensing; optional guardingGuarded cell with safety interlocks
Human InteractionDesigned for close operator interactionMinimal or no human presence
FootprintCompactSmall to larger depending on the cell type
ProgrammingIntuitive, fast changeovers with the Granta easy programming softwareIntuitive, fast changeovers with the Granta easy programming software
ThroughputModerate–highModerate – Very high
InstallationFast, minimal disruptionDependent on the cell complexity but can be as quick as a cobot for low complexity cells
Total Cost of OwnershipLower entry cost, fast ROISmaller cells have a low entry cost with fast ROI, larger cells have a higher initial cost with strong ROI at scale.

How to Use This Comparison

If your operation requires flexibility, frequent changeovers, or close human–robot interaction, a cobot palletiser—especially one configured with guarding for higher speeds—offers an excellent balance of safety and productivity.

If your priority is maximum throughput, heavy payload handling, or fully autonomous operation, an industrial robot palletiser is the most robust and scalable solution.

At Granta Automation, we work closely with customers to evaluate both options and, where appropriate, design hybrid solutions that combine collaborative flexibility with industrial‑level performance.

Conclusion

There is no single “best” palletising solution—only the solution that best aligns with your throughput requirements, safety needs, product characteristics, available space, and long‑term operational strategy. Granta Automation’s approach is to match your operation with the system that delivers the greatest return on investment, whether that’s a flexible cobot palletiser or a high‑performance industrial robot.

If you’d like support in determining the right solution for your facility, our team is ready to help you assess your needs and recommend a tailored palletising system. Contact us on 01223 499488 or helpline@granta-automation.co.uk and we will be happy to discuss.

Bag PalletiserBag Palletiser
Barrel PalletiserBarrel Palletiser
Box PalletiserBox Palletiser
Crate PalletiserCrate Palletiser
Tray PalletiserTray Palletiser

Posted in Auto Palletiser, Automated Container Unloading, Automated Palletising, Bag Palletiser, Box Palletiser, Cobot Palletiser, Compact Palletiser, Container Destuffing, Container Destuffing Palletising, Container Unloading Palletising, Depalletising, Granta Updates, Modular Palletiser, Palletiser, Palletiser - Granta Palletiser System, Palletising, Robotic Palletiser, Robotic Palletising, Small Palletiser | Tagged , | Comments Off on How to Choose Between a Cobot and an Industrial Robot for Palletising

Typical Problems with Palletising Systems and How They’re Overcome

End-of-line operations are often where production efficiency is won or lost. As demand increases and product mixes become more varied, palletising — the final step before goods leave the factory — is under greater pressure to perform. Many businesses turn to automation to solve these challenges, but introducing a palletising system needs to be well executed for optimal success.

Even well-designed systems can run into issues if they’re not properly specified, integrated, or maintained. Understanding these common pitfalls — and the best ways to address them — is essential for anyone planning or operating an automated palletising solution.

1. Product Inconsistency and Packaging Variation

The problem:
Inconsistent packaging is one of the most common hurdles in palletising. Boxes might vary slightly in size, shrink-wrapped packs can deform, and flexible bags may not stack uniformly. These small differences can lead to misaligned stacks, unstable pallets, and stoppages.

The solution:
Automated palletising systems overcome this through specialist gripper designs tailored to your specific product range, offering a wide selection of options from standard vacuum grippers through to specialist underneath grippers. Easy programming software and software-defined pallet patterns make changeovers between SKUs fast and reliable — without needing mechanical adjustments.

2. Limited Floor Space

The problem:
Space at the end of the line is often tight, and traditional palletisers can be bulky. Many older systems were designed for large, open areas and can be difficult to retrofit into existing facilities.

The solution:
Compact and modular designs have transformed what’s possible.  Some systems are extremely compact — for example, the Granta cobot palletiser has a footprint comparable to that of a smart car! Pre-installation simulation ensures the system fits the available space before equipment ever arrives on site.

3. Integration and Communication Issues

The problem:
A palletiser must coordinate perfectly with upstream and downstream equipment — case erectors, labellers, wrappers, and conveyors. If timing or control signals aren’t properly synchronised, the result can be jams, product gaps, or system downtime.

The solution:
Successful integration begins with clear communication between equipment suppliers and the engineering team. Choosing experienced companies that have robust, easy‑to‑use software solutions and strong integration capabilities across a wide range of systems is essential for long‑term success.

4. Downtime, Maintenance, and Operator Confidence

The problem:
A system that frequently stops or requires engineer intervention quickly erodes productivity. Downtime is often linked not just to hardware faults, but to operator uncertainty or lack of visibility into what’s gone wrong.

The solution:
User-friendly HMIs with step-by-step fault guidance and automatic error recovery routines make a major difference. Training operators to manage pattern changes, resets, and simple maintenance tasks builds confidence and reduces dependency on outside support.

5. System Flexibility and Future-Proofing

The problem:
Manufacturing needs evolve — new products, new packaging formats, and new throughput targets are inevitable.

The solution:
Modularity is key. Systems built on scalable hardware and configurable control software can adapt over time. Adding a new SKU, integrating a different gripper, or reconfiguring a pallet pattern should be possible without major rework. By planning for future needs during specification, manufacturers can extend the useful life of their automation investment and protect long-term ROI.

6. Quality Control and Data Visibility

The problem:
Without in-line quality checks, errors can go unnoticed until the product reaches a warehouse or customer. Missing cases, incorrect labels, or unstable pallets can result in costly rework or returns.

The solution:
Integrating inspection technology directly into the palletising process closes the loop. Cameras, barcode scanners, and weight checks verify product identity and count before stacking. Easy‑to‑use programming software suggests and generates stable, tessellating stack patterns.

Building Reliable, High-Performance Palletising Systems

Reliable palletising isn’t just about installing a robot — it’s about designing a system that fits the process, the product, and the people who operate it. The best systems handle variation gracefully, make safety effortless, and give operators the tools to keep production flowing.

When designed and maintained with these principles in mind, a palletising system becomes far more than a mechanical aid — it becomes a critical link in a smarter, more resilient production line.

If you would like to know more about palletising solutions, please contact us 01223 499488 or helpline@granta-automation.co.uk and we will be happy to discuss.

Bag PalletiserBag Palletiser
Barrel PalletiserBarrel Palletiser
Box PalletiserBox Palletiser
Crate PalletiserCrate Palletiser
Tray PalletiserTray Palletiser
Posted in Auto Palletiser, Automated Palletising, Bag Palletiser, Box Palletiser, Cobot Palletiser, Compact Palletiser, Container Destuffing, Container Destuffing Palletising, Container Unloading Palletising, Depalletising, Granta Updates, Modular Palletiser, Palletiser, Palletiser - Granta Palletiser System, Palletising, Robotic Palletiser, Robotic Palletising, Small Palletiser | Tagged , | Comments Off on Typical Problems with Palletising Systems and How They’re Overcome

Driving Operational and Financial Excellence in Manufacturing: A Comprehensive Guide

Manufacturing has long been the backbone of industrial growth, powering economies and shaping societies. Yet, in today’s volatile and hyper-competitive environment, the pressures facing manufacturers are more intense than ever. Global supply chain disruptions, escalating input costs, rising sustainability demands, and rapidly shifting customer expectations are redefining the rules of the game.

For leaders at the helm, stability is no longer sufficient. The challenge is to balance short-term performance with long-term resilience—constantly evaluating operations, driving efficiencies, and ensuring financial performance is not just maintained, but positioned for sustainable growth.

Operational excellence and financial discipline must therefore move in lockstep. One without the other risks eroding competitiveness and profitability. What follows is a structured, actionable framework for assessing current performance and strategies that can be implemented to secure enduring competitive advantage.

1. Establishing a Clear Baseline: Evaluating Current Operations

Before embarking on improvement, it is important to have a complete and accurate picture of where the organisation stands.

Key Dimensions of Operational Evaluation

  1. Production Performance Metrics
    • Overall Equipment Effectiveness (OEE): A single, powerful metric that combines machine availability, performance speed, and output quality. An OEE below 65% usually signals significant inefficiencies.
    • Yield and Scrap Rates: High scrap rates indicate quality issues or poor process control.
    • Cycle Time & Throughput: Are you producing at the designed capacity of your equipment?
  2. Process Mapping and Bottleneck Identification
    Value Stream Mapping (VSM) is a proven method for identifying non-value-added steps. Bottlenecks could be machine-related, supplier-related, or even decision-making delays at management levels.
  3. Workforce Effectiveness
    Assess whether workers are underutilised, overburdened, or misaligned with process needs. A plant may have state-of-the-art machines, but without properly trained and engaged employees, efficiency will stagnate.
  4. Benchmarking Against Industry Peers
    Comparing KPIs—such as unit costs, lead times, and customer on-time delivery rates—against competitors provides an external view of performance gaps.

Tangible Step: Commission a comprehensive operational audit every 12–18 months, either internally (using cross-functional teams) or through external experts, to ensure objectivity.

2. Strengthening Production Efficiency and Operational Excellence

Improvement begins with process discipline. High-performing manufacturers consistently invest in leaner, smarter, and more reliable operations.

Proven Approaches

  1. Lean Manufacturing Practices
    • Implement 5S (Sort, Set in order, Shine, Standardise, Sustain) to maintain organised and efficient workspaces.
    • Conduct Kaizen events (rapid improvement workshops) focused on specific problem areas.
    • Apply Just-in-Time (JIT) principles to reduce excess inventory and improve cash flow.
  2. Automation and Digital Transformation
    • Integrate Manufacturing Execution Systems (MES) to provide real-time data on production performance.
    • Use IoT-enabled predictive maintenance to minimise unplanned downtime and extend asset lifespans.
    • Explore robotics and cobots (collaborative robots) to enhance consistency and reduce manual errors.
  3. Maintenance Strategies
    • Transition from reactive maintenance (fixing when broken) to predictive maintenance (fixing before failure).
    • Adopt Total Productive Maintenance (TPM), involving operators directly in routine machine care, which builds accountability and reduces disruptions.
  4. Standardisation and Quality Assurance
    • Develop clear SOPs for every critical task and monitor compliance.
    • Use Six Sigma methodologies to reduce variability and defects.

Tangible Step: Target a 10–20% reduction in downtime by combining predictive maintenance and lean process improvements within the first year of implementation.

3. Optimising Supply Chain and Inventory Management

A resilient and efficient supply chain is both a cost lever and a competitive differentiator.

Practical Strategies

  1. Supplier Relationship Management
    • Create scorecards tracking supplier performance on quality, cost, and delivery reliability.
    • Negotiate long-term contracts with key suppliers to stabilise pricing and supply continuity.
  2. Inventory Optimisation
    • Use ABC analysis to categorise inventory into high-value, medium-value, and low-value items, aligning stock policies accordingly.
    • Implement Demand-Driven Material Requirements Planning (DDMRP) to adjust inventory based on real consumption rather than forecasts.
  3. Risk Diversification
    • Establish dual sourcing for critical raw materials.
    • Build regional supply networks to reduce reliance on single geographies.
  4. Digital Tools for Visibility
    • ERP systems that integrate procurement, production, and logistics offer end-to-end visibility and faster decision-making.
    • Use AI-powered demand forecasting tools to align supply with actual market needs.

Tangible Step: Set a target to improve inventory turnover ratio by 15–20%, freeing up cash tied in stock without risking stockouts.

4. Evaluating Financial Performance with Precision

Operational improvements must translate into stronger financial outcomes. A Managing Director must go beyond the P&L and scrutinise the underlying drivers of profitability and cash flow.

Key Areas to Evaluate

  1. Cost Structure Analysis
    Break down costs into direct labour, materials, energy, and overhead. Identify “cost sinks” and evaluate outsourcing or process redesign.
  2. Working Capital Management
    • Shorten receivables cycle through stricter credit controls and faster invoicing.
    • Optimise payables strategy to balance supplier goodwill with cash flow efficiency.
    • Improve inventory turnover as highlighted earlier.
  3. Profitability by Product Line and Customer Segment
    Contribution margin analysis often reveals “hidden losses” where certain customers or product lines consume disproportionate resources.
  4. Capital Efficiency
    Measure Return on Invested Capital (ROIC), ensuring every pound of capital employed generates acceptable returns.

Tangible Step: Introduce a monthly financial performance dashboard for the leadership team, tying operational KPIs directly to financial results.

5. Driving Financial Improvement Through Strategic Initiatives

Once evaluation is complete, the MD must champion actionable initiatives that directly lift profitability.

Actionable Levers

  1. Pricing Optimisation
    • Move from cost-plus pricing to value-based pricing, particularly for differentiated or high-precision products.
    • Use data analytics to assess price elasticity and capture higher margins without losing competitiveness.
  2. Cost Transformation
    • Consolidate administrative functions into shared services.
    • Implement energy efficiency programs (e.g., heat recovery systems, LED retrofits) to reduce overheads.
  3. Revenue Diversification
    • Introduce new product lines in response to evolving customer needs.
    • Enter new geographic markets to reduce dependence on cyclical domestic demand.
  4. Capex Discipline
    Apply strict payback period and ROI analysis before approving new machinery, automation, or plant expansions.

Tangible Step: Target a 5–10% improvement in EBITDA margin over 24 months through combined pricing, cost, and product-mix initiatives.

6. Building a Culture of Continuous Improvement

Operational and financial improvements cannot be sustained without cultural alignment. People, not just processes, drive long-term success.

Practical Cultural Strategies

  1. Employee Engagement and Empowerment
    • Introduce employee suggestion schemes tied to tangible rewards.
    • Organise regular Kaizen circles for frontline workers to propose and implement process enhancements.
  2. Transparency Through Performance Dashboards
    • Share plant-level KPIs (OEE, scrap rates, delivery performance) visibly on shop floor boards.
    • Cascade financial targets down to departmental levels, ensuring every team understands how their performance ties to company profitability.
  3. Cross-Functional Collaboration
    • Break silos between production, procurement, finance, and sales through integrated project teams.
    • Introduce end-to-end process ownership instead of departmental KPIs that sometimes conflict.
  4. Leadership Development
    Invest in training for supervisors and middle managers, enabling them to act as change agents and carry improvement initiatives forward.

Tangible Step: Run quarterly “continuous improvement sprints”, where cross-functional teams tackle one high-impact operational or financial challenge.

7. Harnessing the Power of Data and Analytics

Data is the backbone of modern decision-making. Manufacturing leaders who embrace analytics consistently outperform peers.

How to Apply Analytics in Practice

  1. Real-Time Operational Dashboards
    Track live production performance, machine health, and order progress to spot issues before they escalate.
  2. Predictive Analytics
    Use machine learning to forecast demand patterns, anticipate supply disruptions, and schedule maintenance before breakdowns.
  3. Profitability Analytics
    Conduct cost-to-serve analysis to fully understand which customers or orders are most profitable after considering logistics, service, and after-sales costs.
  4. Scenario Planning
    Use financial models to test “what if” scenarios (e.g., energy cost spikes, currency fluctuations) and prepare responses in advance.

Tangible Step: Implement a data analytics program with measurable ROI, such as reducing maintenance costs by 10% through predictive insights within 12 months.

In summary, evaluating and improving operations and financial performance is a continuous cycle, not a one-off initiative. It requires a structured framework:

  • Evaluate comprehensively through audits, metrics, and benchmarking.
  • Improve systematically using lean, automation, and supply chain optimisation.
  • Align operations with finance by focusing on costs, working capital, and profitability.
  • Embed culture and data as enablers of continuous improvement.

The most successful manufacturing leaders are those who combine sharp operational insight with financial acumen, all while cultivating a culture of accountability and innovation. In doing so, they not only safeguard margins today but also secure the company’s competitive edge for the future.

You may find these downloadable tools helpful in your calculations

Bag PalletiserBag Palletiser
Barrel PalletiserBarrel Palletiser
Box PalletiserBox Palletiser
Crate PalletiserCrate Palletiser
Tray PalletiserTray Palletiser
Posted in AGVs, AMRs, Auto Palletiser, Automated Container Unloading, Automated Palletising, Bag Palletiser, Box Palletiser, Cobot Palletiser, Compact Palletiser, Company news, Container Destuffing, Container Destuffing Palletising, Container Unloading Palletising, Depalletising, Granta Updates, Modular Palletiser, Palletiser, Palletiser - Granta Palletiser System, Palletising, Robotic Palletiser, Robotic Palletising, Small Palletiser | Tagged , | Comments Off on Driving Operational and Financial Excellence in Manufacturing: A Comprehensive Guide

Planning for 2026: How Granta Automation Can Transform Your Operations with Palletisers and AMRs

As we approach 2026, manufacturers and warehouse operators are increasingly looking for ways to improve efficiency, reduce costs, and adapt to evolving workforce dynamics. Automation continues to play a pivotal role in achieving these goals, and at Granta Automation, we specialise in helping companies implement solutions that make a measurable impact.

Two technologies in particular—palletisers and autonomous mobile robots (AMRs)—have emerged as key drivers of operational excellence. Whether it’s streamlining end-of-line packaging or optimising intralogistics, these solutions can transform the way your facility operates.

Why Automation Planning Matters Now

Capital expenditure planning doesn’t happen overnight. Automation projects, whether installing a robotic palletiser or deploying a fleet of AMRs, require careful consideration of workflow, space, integration with existing systems, and ROI. Planning early not only ensures a smoother implementation but also helps secure budget approvals and avoid last-minute cost surprises.

By beginning discussions now, your team can evaluate the right technology for your needs, define KPIs, and create a roadmap for deployment in 2026. This proactive approach can lead to significant efficiency gains and set your operation apart from competitors.

Palletisers: Choosing the Right System for Your Operation

Granta Automation offers a range of palletiser solutions designed to meet diverse production needs while maximising efficiency and flexibility. Our portfolio includes:

Modular Palletisers

  • Versatile and flexible: suitable for standard pick-and-place palletising of bags or boxes, high-speed layer-forming palletising, and automated container unloading
  • Fully automated programming option for facilities that frequently change product sizes, allowing the system to automatically set up pallet stack patterns and program the robot
  • Quick reconfiguration: modular design allows the system to adapt to changing production requirements
  • Short lead times and fast installation thanks to its modular architecture
  • Applications: ideal for end-of-line palletising as well as container unloading and palletising

The Modular Palletiser is designed with industrial needs in mind, providing maximum flexibility and efficiency while simplifying operations and minimising downtime. It’s a robust solution for facilities that require versatility and adaptability across multiple product types and production lines.

Compact Palletisers

  • Very compact design ideal for facilities with limited floor space
  • Pallet truck take-off – designed to allow pallets to be removed using a pallet truck
  • 140kg payload robot capable of handling a wide range of products
  • Variety of gripper options available to suit different product types
  • Quick installation to minimize downtime and speed up deployment

This system is perfect for high-speed, small-to-medium production lines where space is at a premium but efficiency and flexibility are still critical.

Cobot Palletisers

  • 30kg payload collaborative robot, ideal for lighter product handling
  • Sturdy industrial-grade design built for 24/7 operation
  • Variety of gripper options to accommodate different product types
  • Quick installation to minimize downtime
  • Available with or without guarding, depending on facility requirements
  • Intelligent force sensing for collaborative operation:
    • In collaborative mode, the cobot works safely alongside human operators, running at slower speeds and stopping immediately if unexpected forces are detected
    • When full safety guarding is in place, it operates at full industrial speeds for maximum efficiency

The cobot’s flexibility allows it to seamlessly switch between safe, human-collaborative operation and high-speed industrial mode, making it a versatile solution for facilities that require both productivity and safety.

Each system is designed to streamline your palletising process, reduce manual handling, and increase productivity. Whether you need a scalable modular solution, a compact high-speed system, or a collaborative cobot setup, Granta Automation has a solution to match your operational requirements.

Easy Programming Software: Simple, Powerful, Efficient

All of our robotic palletising systems come with our user-friendly, easy programming software. This patented software enables you to reprogramming the palletising system quickly and efficiently for different product sizes and stack configurations, without requiring advanced technical expertise.

Key Features:

  • Optimised Stacking Patterns: Automatically generated stacking configurations enable you to choose the most efficient stack pattern for your product. Maximising pallet space and storage efficiency.
  • Rapid Adjustments: Switch between product sizes or pallet layouts in minutes, ensuring flexibility during production shifts.
  • Intuitive User Interface: Simplifies complex programming tasks, enabling operators to make adjustments with minimal training.
  • Multi-Picking Automation: The system automatically rotates and groups products for efficient multi-picking or row gripping.

This cutting-edge AI technology makes automated palletising viable for very short production runs, as little as one pallet load, by removing the prohibitive setup time.

Autonomous Mobile Robots (AMRs)

Autonomous Mobile Robots (AMRs) are transforming intralogistics by moving materials safely and efficiently across warehouses and production floors. Unlike traditional conveyor systems or forklifts, AMRs adapt dynamically to changing environments, reducing congestion and operational bottlenecks.

Granta Automation’s AMR systems provide flexible, safe, and efficient solutions for material handling and intralogistics. Key features include:

  • Easy integration and deployment, allowing rapid implementation into existing operations
  • Advanced safety features: 360° laser, 3D cameras, and mechanical bumper for secure navigation around people and obstacles
  • Efficient charging: fully charges in just 45 minutes
  • High performance: maximum speed of 4.9 mph and a 1200 kg payload capacity
  • Smart navigation: if a path is blocked, the AMR automatically circumnavigates obstacles and recalculates a new route
  • GoControl software: web-based interface accessible from any device to manage orders, prioritise tasks, and dispatch AMRs
    • Displays physical infrastructure (pallet stations, charging stations, conveyors) and virtual infrastructure (parking spots, traffic control zones)
    • Tracks robot location, load status, and destination in real time
    • Easily editable maps allow adding, removing, or rearranging components

These AMRs are ideal for a variety of applications, from transporting heavy pallets across warehouse floors to integrating with production lines for continuous material flow. Their intelligent routing and robust safety systems ensure reliable operation, even in dynamic environments.

Supporting Your 2026 CapEx Planning

If you’re considering Palletisers or AMRs for 2026, Granta Automation can help you evaluate options and provide a budgetary quote tailored to your operation. This allows you to make informed decisions, align your investments with strategic goals, and confidently plan your capital expenditure.

Planning ahead also ensures you can explore innovative configurations, evaluate ROI, and minimise disruption during implementation. Early engagement with Granta Automation gives your team the insights and guidance needed to deploy automation solutions efficiently and effectively.

Take the Next Step

Automation is no longer a future concept—it’s a practical solution that drives measurable results today. If you have projects planned for 2026 involving palletisers or AMRs, now is the time to start planning. You may find these tools useful in helping you to calculate ROI.

Contact us on 01223 499488 or helpline@granta-automation.co.uk to discuss your upcoming projects, explore potential solutions, and receive a budget quote to support your CapEx planning. Together, we can help you build a more efficient, safer, and future-ready operation.

Bag PalletiserBag Palletiser
Barrel PalletiserBarrel Palletiser
Box PalletiserBox Palletiser
Crate PalletiserCrate Palletiser
Tray PalletiserTray Palletiser
Posted in AMRs, Auto Palletiser, Automated Palletising, Bag Palletiser, Box Palletiser, Cobot Palletiser, Compact Palletiser, Company news, Container Destuffing Palletising, Container Unloading Palletising, Granta Updates, Modular Palletiser, Palletiser, Palletiser - Granta Palletiser System, Palletising, Robotic Palletiser, Robotic Palletising, Small Palletiser | Tagged , | Comments Off on Planning for 2026: How Granta Automation Can Transform Your Operations with Palletisers and AMRs

Which Palletiser System Is Best for Palletising Boxes?

Palletising boxes may seem like a simple process, but when it comes to scaling production, reducing costs, and ensuring consistency, the palletiser you choose can make or break your efficiency. With many different palletising systems on the market, how do you decide which is the best fit for your business?

At Granta Automation, we focus on three main types of palletisers: Modular Robotic Palletisers, Compact Palletisers, and Cobot Palletisers. Each has its own strengths, and best-use cases.

This guide provides a complete overview of the different palletiser types, including features, benefits, and ROI considerations, to help you make the right decision for your business.

Why Automate Box Palletising?

Before diving into the system types, its worth understanding why automation is so valuable in box palletising.

Key Benefits of Automated Palletising

  • Labour savings: Reduce reliance on manual handling, especially in high-turnover environments.
  • Health & safety improvements: Eliminate repetitive strain injuries and heavy lifting tasks.
  • Consistency & stability: Automated systems stack boxes in neat, repeatable patterns.
  • Speed & throughput: Systems can work faster and for longer hours than manual labour.
  • Scalability: As production grows, automation can be scaled to meet demand.

With rising labour costs and increasing health and safety regulations, many companies now see automated palletising as not just a cost-saver, but a necessity.

The Three Main Palletiser Systems for Boxes

1. Modular Robotic Palletiser

The modular robotic palletiser is a high-performance, flexible solution designed for heavy-duty and high-speed palletising. Its modular design makes it highly scalable, allowing businesses to add or reconfigure elements as production demands grow.

Features

  • Payload: Up to 140 kg
  • Product types: Boxes, cartons, trays, and even bags
  • Configuration: Can perform single pick, row picking or full layer forming
  • Scalability: Modular design allows for future expansion
  • Speed: High throughput suitable for 24/7 production
  • Programming: Very easy to reconfigure for new pallet patterns or products using the simple easy programming software interface

Advantages

  • Handles a wide variety of products and pallet patterns
  • Excellent for high payload and high-volume lines
  • Very reliable and durable for industrial use
  • Flexible enough to adapt to changing production layouts
  • Can be used to palletise off multiple production lines

Limitations

  • Larger footprint required
  • Higher initial investment
  • Not designed for pallet truck take-off

Best For

Large-scale operations where speed, payload capacity, and scalability are the top priorities.

2. Compact Palletiser

The Compact Palletiser is ideal for businesses that need robust automation in a small footprint. It integrates pallet truck removal, automatic pallet feeding, and box handling into a streamlined design.

Features

  • Payload: Up to 140 kg
  • Product types: Boxes, cartons, trays, and even bags
  • Configuration: Can perform single pick or row pick
  • Footprint: Very compact design, smaller than traditional robot cells
  • Integration: Built-in infeed conveyors and automated pallet handling
  • Programming: Very easy to reconfigure for new pallet patterns or products using the simple easy programming software interface

Advantages

  • Takes up very little floor space
  • Excellent for heavy loads and high-volume lines
  • Highly reliable and durable for industrial use
  • Can be used to palletise off multiple production lines

Limitations

  • Less future-proof than modular systems
  • Limited expandability for future expansion

Best For

Manufacturers with restricted floor space that still need strong, reliable palletising performance with pallet truck take off.

3. Cobot Palletiser

The Cobot Palletiser uses collaborative robot technology to palletise boxes safely alongside human workers. It is designed for flexibility and ease of use, making it perfect for businesses handling varied products or smaller batch sizes.

Features

  • Payload: Up to 30 kg
  • Safety: Force-limited, with built-in sensors
  • Operation modes: Collaborative (safe to run alongside people) or industrial speed (when full safety is in place)
  • Programming: Very easy to reconfigure for new pallet patterns or products using the simple easy programming software interface
  • Footprint: Compact, fits into smaller production spaces
  • Moveable: Can be moved between production lines

Advantages

  • Low-cost entry into automated palletising
  • Excellent flexibility for use on multiple lines and frequent product changeovers
  • Safe to use alongside people

Limitations

  • Lower throughput compared to larger industrial robots as only single items can be picked
  • Limited payload (not suited for very heavy boxes)

Best For

Businesses needing flexibility, safety, and ease of use.

Side-by-Side Comparison

ROI and Payback Considerations

Automating palletising often delivers a fast return on investment, but ROI will vary by system type and production environment.

Key ROI Factors

  • Labour savings: Fewer staff required for repetitive stacking tasks.
  • Injury reduction: Lower costs associated with manual handling injuries.
  • Increased throughput: More pallets per shift, fewer bottlenecks.
  • Flexibility gains: Ability to switch quickly between product types and reduce downtime.

Typical ROI:

While ROI timelines can vary based on factors such as the specific industry, production volume, and overall operational efficiency, many businesses begin to see a payback period ranging from 12 to 24 months. Some forward-thinking manufacturers even achieve full ROI in less than 12 months, which positions robotic palletisers as a highly cost-effective solution in the long term.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: Can one palletiser handle multiple box sizes?
Yes – all Granta palletisers come with easy programming software which enables factory staff to reprogram the palletiser for different box sizes/stack patterns within minutes.

Q: What if my production grows in the future?
A modular palletiser is a good choice for scalability as it can be expanded as your production increases, ensuring long-term flexibility. Compact and Cobot systems can manage growth to a certain extent, but they are less expandable. However, in many cases, palletiser systems are initially installed well below their maximum run capacity, giving you room to grow before needing an upgrade.

Q: How long does installation take?
It depends on the complexity of the system being installed, but typically the initial install will be completed in about a week, with commissioning then taking place after this.

Q: Do palletisers require safety guarding?
Modular and compact palletiser systems require guarding, and cobot palletisers can operate without guarding depending on the application and speeds required.

Conclusion

The ‘best’ palletiser for your operation depends on your unique requirements:

  • Modular Palletiser – High speed, handles heavy loads, and easily scalable for future growth.
  • Compact Palletiser – Space-saving design with pallet truck take-off and high-speed operation.
  • Cobot Palletiser – Flexible, safe, and ideal for low-payload products.

By carefully aligning your production needs with the right system, you can achieve significant efficiency gains, reduce manual handling risks, and ensure your investment delivers long-term value.

In addition, all three palletiser types are powered by our unique Easy Programming software. Unlike traditional systems that often require specialist coding knowledge, this intuitive software uses a simple graphical interface that enables operators to set up or adjust pallet patterns within minutes, with minimal training. From drag-and-drop configuration to rapid re-setups when box sizes or pallet formats change, the software ensures maximum flexibility and minimal downtime. This means your palletiser is not only the best fit today, but can also adapt easily as your production needs evolve.

Call us on 01223 499488 or helpline@granta-automation.co.uk, to discuss the best palletising solution for your application.

Bag PalletiserBag Palletiser
Barrel PalletiserBarrel Palletiser
Box PalletiserBox Palletiser
Crate PalletiserCrate Palletiser
Tray PalletiserTray Palletiser
Posted in Auto Palletiser, Automated Palletising, Box Palletiser, Cobot Palletiser, Compact Palletiser, Granta Updates, Modular Palletiser, Palletiser, Palletiser - Granta Palletiser System, Palletising, Robotic Palletiser, Robotic Palletising, Small Palletiser | Tagged , | Comments Off on Which Palletiser System Is Best for Palletising Boxes?

Common Pitfalls in Scaling Manufacturing Operations

Scaling a manufacturing business is never a straight line. Growth brings opportunity, but it also magnifies inefficiencies, exposes weak systems, and tests leadership discipline. Companies that scale too fast without the right foundation often end up eroding margins, burning out their workforce, and leaving customers frustrated. On the other hand, scaling too slowly—or failing to prepare for scale—can mean losing ground to competitors who were bolder and better prepared.

Here, we outline the most common mistakes manufacturers make when scaling their operations, along with practical lessons drawn from composite case studies that reflect real-world industry patterns.

1. Scaling Before Optimising Existing Processes

One of the most frequent—and costly—errors manufacturers make is assuming that adding more machines, people, or facilities will solve existing problems. If your processes are inefficient at 10,000 units per month, they’ll be exponentially worse at 50,000.

Why it happens: Leaders feel pressure to grow fast, especially when demand is strong. Investors and customers may be urging expansion, but adding capacity without fixing bottlenecks is like pouring water into a leaky bucket.

The smarter approach: Before investing heavily in expansion, audit your current workflows. Apply lean principles, cut unnecessary steps, and implement tighter quality control at your existing scale. Streamlining before scaling not only saves money but also prevents you from embedding inefficiencies into a larger, harder-to-fix system. The companies that succeed at scaling are often those that spend the most time fine-tuning their operations before stepping on the gas.

2. Financial Overreach and Mismanagement

Scaling requires capital. But many companies underestimate how much cash is tied up in inventory, receivables, and longer production cycles. Others make the mistake of assuming that increased volume will automatically drive profitability.

Common financial missteps include:

  • Over-leveraging debt to finance expansion without clear repayment strategies.
  • Ignoring working capital needs during scale-up.
  • Failing to model different demand scenarios—optimistic, conservative, and worst-case.
  • Assuming bulk raw material purchases will always lower costs (without factoring in storage and spoilage risks).

Lesson: A disciplined financial model is as important as a production plan. Cash flow should be stress-tested for volatility in raw material prices, customer payment delays, and potential demand fluctuations. Experienced manufacturers know that running out of cash in the middle of a scale-up is far more damaging than running out of capacity.

3. Underinvesting in Technology

Technology is not a luxury when scaling—it is the backbone of sustainable growth. Yet too many manufacturers stick with outdated ERP systems, manual reporting, and siloed communication channels even as they expand.

Why this matters: Without real-time visibility into operations, it’s impossible to make agile decisions. Bottlenecks remain hidden, quality issues are discovered too late, and forecasting becomes guesswork. What works for a 20-person team breaks down at 200.

Smart investments include:

  • Scalable ERP and MES platforms that integrate finance, production, and supply chain.
  • IoT-enabled equipment monitoring for predictive maintenance.
  • Data analytics tools to support demand forecasting and process optimisation.
  • Automation solutions such as automated palletiser that free up skilled staff for higher-value tasks.

Companies that treat technology as an afterthought often find themselves forced into costly retrofits down the line. In contrast, manufacturers that plan for digital infrastructure early often scale more smoothly and with fewer surprises.

4. Neglecting People and Culture

Scaling is as much about people as it is about machines and capital. Companies often expand production capacity but fail to prepare their teams for the operational and cultural shifts that come with it.

Signs of trouble:

  • Skilled workers are stretched too thin, leading to errors and burnout.
  • Training programs don’t keep pace with new technologies and processes.
  • Communication between leadership and frontline staff breaks down.
  • A once-close-knit culture starts to fragment under the weight of rapid growth.

The overlooked factor: Employees who once wore multiple hats may struggle in a more complex environment where specialisation is required. Without deliberate investment in training, leadership development, and communication channels, companies risk alienating their best people.

Lesson: Scaling should enhance culture, not erode it. Leaders who double down on employee engagement, recognition, and development during growth phases often find their teams become stronger and more committed rather than stretched to breaking point.

5. Composite Case Studies: Lessons From the Field

The following examples are composites, drawn from patterns observed across multiple manufacturers. They illustrate common pitfalls and best practices, while preserving anonymity.

Failure Scenario: The Electronics Manufacturer That Grew Too Fast
A mid-sized electronics company doubled its factory size to meet rising demand from a single large customer. But because they failed to optimise processes beforehand, defect rates skyrocketed. The new facility magnified existing inefficiencies, and when the customer cut orders, the company was left with crippling debt and excess capacity. Within three years, the business had to restructure and lay off half its workforce.

Success Scenario: The Precision Components Supplier That Scaled Smartly
Another manufacturer took a phased approach—first investing in process automation and lean training at its existing facility. Only after consistently hitting quality and delivery targets did they expand into a new plant. By leveraging integrated ERP systems and predictive analytics, they scaled smoothly and gained a reputation for reliability in a competitive sector. Within five years, they had doubled revenue without eroding margins.

Failure Scenario: The Textile Firm That Ignored Culture
A family-owned textile business tripled production capacity in just two years, but neglected workforce planning. Employees were overwhelmed by longer shifts, training lagged behind new machine installations, and miscommunication caused costly errors. Morale collapsed, leading to a wave of resignations from highly skilled technicians—the very people needed to keep production on track.

Success Scenario: The Automotive Supplier That Invested in People
By contrast, an automotive parts supplier scaling from regional to national distribution invested as much in its people as in its equipment. The company introduced structured apprenticeship programs, continuous training in new technologies, and clear communication from leadership about the reasons behind every change. As production ramped up, so did employee loyalty, reducing turnover and increasing efficiency.

Conclusion

Scaling a manufacturing business is not just about doing more—it’s about doing better, then bigger. The biggest mistakes—rushing into growth without optimisation, neglecting financial discipline, ignoring technology, and overlooking people—are avoidable with foresight and discipline.

For manufacturers, the lesson is clear: invest in process, people, and platforms before you invest in square footage and machinery. Growth should be the result of readiness, not desperation. The businesses that thrive at scale are those that grow deliberately, balancing ambition with preparation and building a foundation that can support their future success.

Ready to improve palletising efficiency in your facility?

Call us on 01223 499488, or request a free consultation today. Let us help you stack smarter, work faster, and build an operation that’s ready for whatever comes next.

Bag PalletiserBag Palletiser
Barrel PalletiserBarrel Palletiser
Box PalletiserBox Palletiser
Crate PalletiserCrate Palletiser
Tray PalletiserTray Palletiser
Posted in AGVs, AMRs, Auto Palletiser, Automated Container Unloading, Automated Palletising, Bag Palletiser, Box Palletiser, Cobot Palletiser, Compact Palletiser, Container Destuffing, Container Destuffing Palletising, Container Unloading Palletising, Depalletising, Granta Updates, Modular Palletiser, Palletiser, Palletiser - Granta Palletiser System, Palletising, Robotic Palletiser, Robotic Palletising, Small Palletiser | Tagged , | Comments Off on Common Pitfalls in Scaling Manufacturing Operations